HOW COULD WITNESSES BE WRONG WHEN THEY SAW JFK'S HEAD WOUND IN THE RIGHT REAR?

QUESTION TO PONDER#4

How could all the witnesses in Dallas be mistaken when they said the wound in JFK's head was in the right rear?

If JFK was shot from the rear,  the bullet would enter the back of his head & exit to the front, but if JFK was shot from the front, it would exit to the rear.  

The Warren Report says JFK was shot by a "lone assassin" firing from behind.  If this is true witnesses would have seen damage at the front of JFK's head but if he was shot from the front the damage would be in the rear.

Clint Hill told the Warren Commission in 1964:

"The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. There was blood and bits of brain all over the...rear portion of the car.  There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound...except for the one... in the right rear portion of the head..".

                 Clint Hill on Back of Limo
                             Dallas, Texas
                      November 22, 1963
                  Photo by Justin Newman
                    Public Domain Photo

In Robert Groden's The Killing of a President (1993) there are photographs of 7 Parkland doctors & a nurse ALL using their right hand held to the area behind their right ear to show the location of JFK's head wound. 

Groden also shows photographs of other witnesses including two who were present at the autopsy at Bethesda.  Again, 6  more witnesses show the wound in the BACK of the head (right rear).

JFK ASSASSINATION OPINION:


The only way that these witnesses could be wrong is if they were all lying.